Using Citation Analysis to help discover related research is one way to expand your research. Tools that help match related research can also be helpful. Some common mapping tools include:
ResearchRabbit is an innovative “citation-based literature mapping tool” available online. The scope of such tool is to optimize your time searching for references as you start planning your essay, minor project, or literature review.
Elicit is an AI tool to find 'seed articles' to mine for keywords/subject headings. When you enter a question, it returns alternate questions that can lead to further "seed" articles.
Litmaps
Connected Papers
Inciteful
Citation Analysis can give you valuable insight into the impact of a scholar's work. Citation counts measure the impact of a particular publicaton or an individual author by counting the number of times either has been cited in other works.
When looking for citation counts, is it better to use Web of Science or Google Scholar?
Since each has its advantages and disadvantages, it's really a good idea to search both and compare the results. And you may also want to consult discipline-specific databases that offer citation data.
Anne-Wil Harzig, Professor of International Management at the University of Melbourne and creator of Publish or Perish software, offers a good analysis of the relative disadvantages of both Web of Science and Google Scholar in Google Scholar: A New Data Source for Citation Analysis.
This analysis of a particular author's work is one of the components used to evaluate the quality of that's individual's scholarly output and the impact he or she is having upon a particular discipline. Although such counting sounds relatively straightforward, it is complicated by the fact that there is no single citation analysis source that covers all publications and their cited references. The two primary sources for citation information are: